What is the 99 investor rule?

A 3(c)(1) fund may have no more than 99 Accredited Investors, while a 3(c)(7) fund can have up to 1999 investors, but these must all be “Qualified Purchasers”. The qualified purchaser, or QP, definition is a significant increase in the required net worth compared to accredited investors.

tinyseed.com - Forcing Small Investors Out of Big Opportunities: SEC's 99 Investor Limit

How can I get rid of bed bugs fast permanently?

Bedbugs, how to get rid of them permanently: Identify and inspect. Wash infested fabrics and linens. Deep clean mattresses. Fix and fill in cracks....

Last updated May 17, 2022

What Colours attract people's attention?

Bright, bold and vibrant colors work best. However, any color that contrasts with your background will serve you well. Shades of yellow, orange,...

Last updated Dec 4, 2019

Awaken your dormant DNA ability to attract wealth effortlessly

The simple yet scientifically proven Wealth DNA method laid out in the report allows you to effortlessly start attracting the wealth and abundance you deserve.

Learn More »

Promotion

Please help raise awareness of this issue:

Fund regulations and SEC rules are fairly complicated; read on for our breakdown of what everything means below:

Current SEC regulatory regime for private funds

3(c)(1) vs. 3(c)(7)

The SEC’s regulatory regime currently provides 2 exemptions to the (burdensome and expensive) requirement for a venture fund like ours to be registered with the SEC: 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7). A 3(c)(1) fund may have no more than 99 Accredited Investors, while a 3(c)(7) fund can have up to 1999 investors, but these must all be “Qualified Purchasers”. The qualified purchaser, or QP, definition is a significant increase in the required net worth compared to accredited investors.

Why can’t investors pool their money and create a single entity to invest?

The SEC stipulates that accredited investors cannot pool their money and create a single entity (for example through an SPV) to invest in the fund – the SEC will “look through” this entity and count the number of investors there as long as the entity was created for the purpose of making a specific investment.

Why can’t we create parallel funds?

Another often suggested option, to run several parallel funds that co-invest, is also forbidden, as the SEC will count as a single fund, any set of funds that a reasonable investor would deem to be identical.

One burdensome option: The “QP sleeve”

The only exception to the above is what’s sometimes referred to as a “QP sleeve”. A 3(c)(1) fund may operate in parallel with a separate 3(c)(7) fund. This does add significant overheads, but frees up some slots for accredited investors by moving the qualified purchasers into the 3(c)(7) (of which there can be 1999).

The recent JOBS act

A more recent change was introduced with the JOBS act, which expanded the ability of fund managers to promote their offerings publicly, with the trade-off that doing so would tighten the requirement to verify that all investors were in fact accredited investors (a 506c offering). We think these changes are laudable, as they increase awareness of specific offerings among accredited investors while also adding further, appropriate, protections. Recent regulatory efforts to expand investment opportunities, harmonize regulations with other jurisdictions and further capital formation

When should I change my wallet?

There is a range of important reasons that you should consider changing your wallet, ranging from your old wallet is worn and tired, right through...

Last updated Jun 27, 2018

What happens if I drink cinnamon everyday?

Summary While eating cinnamon may help lower your blood sugar, eating too much may cause it to fall too low, especially if you're on medication for...

Last updated Jan 30, 2022

Awaken your dormant DNA ability to attract wealth effortlessly

The simple yet scientifically proven Wealth DNA method laid out in the report allows you to effortlessly start attracting the wealth and abundance you deserve.

Learn More »

Promotion

The SEC very recently issued updated accredited investor definitions:

For the first time, individuals will be permitted to participate in our private capital markets not only based on their income or net worth, but also based on established, clear measures of financial sophistication.

(Emphasis ours.)

We salute this change, and even though we think the SEC has further to go in terms of widening the definition of accredited investors, it’s a great first step. This change is well inline with the SECs ongoing efforts to “simplify, harmonize, and improve the exempt offering framework, thereby expanding investment opportunities while maintaining appropriate investor protections and promoting capital formation.” However, we believe that the current limit of 99 accredited investors per 3(c)(1) fund runs counter to these efforts.

The many downsides of the 99 accredited investor limit

The current limit of 99 accredited investors hurts capital formation, reduces investment opportunities, increases the risk to individual investors and decreases access to private capital markets for underrepresented groups. A fund manager can accept smaller checks from wealthier individuals, as the higher QP limit in the sleeve means that there is effectively no minimum amount required of those individuals. Conversely, and perversely, a fund manager looking to raise a more substantial fund is forced to ask for larger checks from the less wealthy investor, or keep that investor out of the fund entirely. This is far from ideal and, in our experience, excludes sophisticated investors from being allowed to invest in funds like ours. In some cases these excluded investors have a deep understanding of the industry being invested into, and perhaps with atypical backgrounds as far as fund investors go. We do not believe those kinds of investors should be effectively excluded from making these kinds of investments. Instead what happens is that as funds grow from very small (sub $10m) they are forced to seek capital from larger, institutional investors like Fund of Funds, Endowments and various Family Offices. While these more institutional LPs are a fine source of capital, it’s undoubtedly true that they are more risk averse and in general prone to relying on a proven track record for the managers they back.

Do we get anything for 10k views on Instagram reels?

How many views do you need on Reels to get paid? The target view count varies for each creator but at the bare minimum, you need to hit at least...

Last updated Dec 14, 2018

Which plant is lucky for entrance door?

It is said when a basil plant is placed near to the entrance it acts as one of the good fortune plants for the front door as it attributes to...

Last updated Jul 9, 2022

Awaken your dormant DNA ability to attract wealth effortlessly

The simple yet scientifically proven Wealth DNA method laid out in the report allows you to effortlessly start attracting the wealth and abundance you deserve.

Learn More »

Promotion

A great example of this is the University of Texas’ (laudable) Emerging Managers Program. This is a program setup explicitly to support new (aka emerging) managers, though the criteria for selection includes:

Attributable track record within target strategy

Investment teams with history of working together

Principals known in the investment community and are positively referenceable

Clearly, such terms favor managers that “emerge” from existing funds. This means that the type of general partners that more easily get backing from these kinds of investors are of the same mold as GPs that already exist. New and diverse GPs with novel ways to invest are effectively locked into staying small or violating SEC rules.

Proposed solution:

Allow as many Accredited Investors as Qualified Purchasers.

The oversight of private funds is light by definition, so we fully understand why the SEC imposes a limit on the number of investors. Without a limit, a fraudulent fund could become a significant issue if tens or hundreds of thousands of investors could invest. However, we feel the unintended consequences of concentrating wealth creation to only super high net worth individuals or institutional investors with the 99 Accredited Investors limit is not the right trade-off in this regard. We propose that private funds relying on the 3(c)(1) exemption should be allowed to admit up to 1999 accredited investors, assuming they are required to make reasonable efforts to verify that investors are in fact accredited (something that is already a requirement for a 506c offering.)

tinyseed.com - Forcing Small Investors Out of Big Opportunities: SEC's 99 Investor Limit

Can you bring both a backpack and a carry-on?

Most airlines allow passengers to bring on both a carry-on and a personal item like a backpack, laptop bag, purse, briefcase, shopping bag, etc....

Last updated Jul 22, 2021

Is luck the same as karma?

Luck is easy. Luck requires no effort. Karma takes work, real hustle, real drive. There is a cynicism towards hard work that seems to emerge a lot...

Last updated Oct 19, 2018

Awaken your dormant DNA ability to attract wealth effortlessly

The simple yet scientifically proven Wealth DNA method laid out in the report allows you to effortlessly start attracting the wealth and abundance you deserve.

Learn More »

Promotion

What does putting a lemon in your bedroom do?

Lemons also act as natural air fresheners and deodorizer—so while that lemon is on your nightstand, it's playing double duty, freshening the air...

Last updated Sep 13, 2022

Awaken your dormant DNA ability to attract wealth effortlessly

The simple yet scientifically proven Wealth DNA method laid out in the report allows you to effortlessly start attracting the wealth and abundance you deserve.

Learn More »

Promotion

Which zodiacs are good singers?

Cancer, Aries, Virgo: THESE zodiac signs make the best singers . The signs show a trait of people born within the given dates. Cancer, Aries,...

Last updated Nov 8, 2019